CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 150 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Miller group +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02664532
NCT02664532N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Miller Straight Blade With Paraglossal Technique Compared to the Macintosh Blade in Respect to Visualization of Larynx and Ease of Intubation

Tata Main Hospital·interventional·Posted Jan 27, 2016·Updated Mar 11, 2016

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Miller group and Macintosh group for Intubation; Difficult. Completed, enrolled 150 participants.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this prospective open labeled randomized study was to compare the "laryngoscopic glottis view" as well as "ease of intubation" between the two blades in routine intubations in non-difficult airways.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsIntubation; Difficult
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 27, 2016
Enrollment StartJan 1, 2010
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2010
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 11 monthsPosted 10.4 years ago

Interventions

Miller groupother

Miller blade was used for laryngoscopy

Macintosh groupother

Macintosh blade was used for laryngoscopy