CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 96 enrolled
Drug / intervention
triple antibiotic ointment dressing +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02681757
NCT02681757N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

A Comparison of Mepitel Ag vs Antibiotic Ointment When Used With the Soft Cast Technique for the Treatment of Pediatric Hand and Foot Burns, a Prospective Study

University of Colorado, Denver·interventional·Posted Feb 12, 2016·Updated Dec 18, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating triple antibiotic ointment dressing and Mepitel Ag for Burns. Completed, enrolled 96 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The aim of this study is to compare Mepitel Ag to Triple antibiotic ointment impregnated Adaptic gauze when used with the soft cast technique to assess overall time to healing, yeast infection rate and parents perception of pain level at time of dressing change on a scale of 1-10. The hypothesis is that Mepitel Ag in combination with the soft cast technique improves wound healing in pediatric partial to deep partial thickness hand and foot burns by decreasing the length of healing time, decreasing the risk of yeast infection, and decreasing pain associated with dressing changes.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsBurns
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 12, 2016
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2016
Primary CompletionSep 29, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 10.4 years ago

Interventions

triple antibiotic ointment dressingdevice

used for control group under soft cast

Mepitel Agdevice

used for variable/experimental group under soft cast