CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 70 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Local Group +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02696122
NCT02696122N/ACompleted

Quality of Recovery After Local Infiltration Under General Anesthesia Via Laryngeal Mask or Spinal Anesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo·interventional·Posted Mar 2, 2016·Updated Nov 1, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Local Group and Spinal anesthesia for Quality of Life and 3 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 70 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Different anesthetic techniques have been proposed for carrying out Inguinal hernia repair, including local anesthesia, regional and general. There are no recent data on the application of a validated questionnaire to assess which anesthetic technique, local infiltration under general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia, would provide better quality of recovery in the opinion of the patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The aim of the study is to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing the quality of recovery (QoR-40) after local infiltration under general anesthesia via laryngeal mask (LMA) or spinal anesthesia for unilateral inguinal hernia repair. METHODS - Seventy patients aged 18 to 65 years old, who were scheduled to undergo unilateral inguinal hernia repair at Santa Lucinda Hospital will be enrolled in the study. The anesthesia will be performed according to the following sequence: L Group - intravenous (I.V.) propofol and alfentanyl, followed by LMA positioning. The anesthesia will be maintained by propofol. For local anesthesia, approximately 50 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine will be infiltrated along the line of incision in the subcutaneous plane, followed by peripheral nerve block technique (e.g., ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block) and local wound infiltration at the fascial level. S Group - spinal puncture followed by intrathecal 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine injection and sedation with propofol by continuous infusion. Pain will be assessed every 15 minutes at Post-anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale and I.V. morphine will be administered to maintain the pain score below 4. The QoR-40 will be administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesBrazil
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 2, 2016
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2016
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2016
Study CompletionJan 1, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 7 monthsPosted 10.3 years ago

Interventions

Local Groupprocedure

General anesthesia willl be induced with propofol 2 mg mg. kg-1 and alfentanyl 30 mcg.kg-1. Once an appropriate depth of anesthesia had been obtained, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) will be positioned. The anesthesia will be maintained by propofol 4 to 5 mg. kg-1.h-1. Ventilation will controlled by adjusting the flow volume and respiratory rate to keep the end-tidal CO2 level (PETCO2) between 30 and 40 mmHg. For local anesthesia, approximately 50 ml of 0.5% ropivacaive will infiltrated along the line of incision in the subcutaneous plane, followed by peripheral nerve block technique (e.g., ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block) and local wound infiltration at the fascial level.

Spinal anesthesiaprocedure

Spinal puncture will be performed with the patient in the sitting position, using 27G disposable Quincke needles (B. Braun, Meisungen, AG). After obtaining CSF, 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine will be injected.