At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Accuracy of Commercially Available Heart Rate Monitors: A Prospective Study
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Fitbit Charge HR, Apple Watch, and 2 other interventions for Healthy. Completed, enrolled 50 participants.
Detailed Summary
Over the last two decades, there has been a proliferation of commercially available heart rate monitors. Recognizing that elite athletes often use heart rate to monitor training and assess aerobic fitness, fitness companies have offered a variety of heart rate monitoring systems to the general public. Recently, there has been a move from monitors that rely on chest straps to measure electrical activity toward more convenient, wrist-worn monitors that employ optical sensing technology similar to that used for pulse oximetry. While the accuracy of chest strap monitors has been assessed in a variety of studies, there is no data concerning the accuracy of wrist-worn heart rate monitors. Assessment of the monitors' accuracy is important both for the subjects who rely upon these monitors to guide their athletic activity and for the physicians to whom these individuals report their heart rate readings.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Fitbit Charge HR heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7
Apple Watch heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7
Mio Fuse heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7
Basis Peak heart rate monitoring device compared to ECG and Polar H7