CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 1Completed· 16 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Protocol for rapid FiO2 optimizationother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02698826
NCT02698826Phase 1Completed

Reoxygenation After Cardiac Arrest II (REOX II Study)

The Cooper Health System·interventional·Posted Mar 4, 2016·Updated Mar 29, 2022

In Brief

A Phase 1 clinical trial evaluating Protocol for rapid FiO2 optimization for Cardiac Arrest. Completed, enrolled 16 participants across 5 sites.

Detailed Summary

The broad objective of this study is to test the association between hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and outcome. After obtaining written informed consent subjects enrolled in REOX II will undergo a rapid faction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) optimization protocol to prevent exposure to hyperoxia. We will compare outcomes between subjects enrolled in REOX I (observational study only) and REOX II (intervention: rapid FiO2 optimization protocol). Our overarching hypothesis is that exposure to hyperoxia after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is associated with increased oxidative stress and worsened neurological and cognitive outcomes.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsCardiac Arrest
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

Phase 1CompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 4, 2016
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2016
Primary CompletionOct 1, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.5 yearsPosted 10.3 years ago

Interventions

Protocol for rapid FiO2 optimizationother

We plan to test a protocol for FiO2 optimization for mechanically ventilated post-cardiac arrest subjects, with a therapeutic goal of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) of 60-99 mmHg, based on the PaO2 range that was associated with the lowest risk of poor outcome in our previously published work. We also use PaO2 (measured by arterial blood gas \[ABG\] analysis) as the ultimate goal rather than arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measured by pulse oximetry because an SaO2 value \<100% on pulse oximetry monitoring does not always exclude supranormal PaO2. The protocol in this application begins with very rapid reduction of FiO2 as much as possible according to SaO2 values, and when FiO2 is maximally reduced by SaO2 an ABG is measured, followed by finer adjustment of FiO2 to achieve a PaO2 60-99 mmHg. The protocol not only prescribes each downward titration of FiO2 but it also includes detailed limbs for upward titration of FiO2 to account for potential "overshoot" in FiO2 reduction.