At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses to Endotracheal Intubation With Glidescope Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Glidescope and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Blood Pressure. Completed, enrolled 70 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation causes significant hemodynamic response and thus presents an increased risk for patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery. Prevention or reduction of this increment is important for hemodynamic control. In this randomized single blind study, the aim of this study is to compare the hemodynamic responses of two different laryngoscopy techniques with Glidescope and Macintosh laryngoscope in coronary cardiac bypass surgery patients.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
This standard GlideScope (GS) technique involves a midline laryngoscopy followed by insertion of a styletted endotracheal tube, once an adequate view of the vocal cords is achieved.
This technique involves a laryngoscopy followed by insertion of a styletted endotracheal tube, once an adequate view of the vocal cords is achieved.