At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Two Gingival Displacement Procedures; a Randomized Clinical Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Aquasil Ultra Cordless, Dentsply and Ultrapak, Ultradent cord for Gingival Retraction Techniques. Completed, enrolled 16 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Purpose: To compare the quality of impressions made with a cordless gingival displacement procedure versus impressions made with a corded technique. The devices and materials used in both procedures are FDA-approved, marketed, and will be used according to label. Participants: Approximately sixty (60) adult patients who are treatment planned for indirect restorations (crowns) at the UNC School of Dentistry. Procedures (methods): Participants will be randomized to receive either the cordless gingival displacement procedure (Aquasil Ultra Cordless, Dentsply), or the corded technique (Ultrapak, Intradent) followed by impression with Aquasil Ultra, Dentsply. Participants will complete the Faces pain scale. Impressions will be photographed, digitally scanned, and evaluated.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Cordless gingival displacement procedure
Cordless gingival displacement procedure