CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
Phase 4Completed· 112 enrolled
Drug / intervention
COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH +1 moredrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02738580
NCT02738580Phase 4Completed

Analysis of Follicular Steroid Synthesis During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant FSH vs HMG in GnRH Antagonist Cycles

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA·interventional·Posted Apr 14, 2016·Updated Mar 3, 2020

In Brief

A Phase 4 clinical trial evaluating COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSH and COS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG for Infertility and Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation. Completed, enrolled 112 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Serum concentrations of the different hormones involved in follicular steroid genesis during a cycle of controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH or HMG will be compared in this study. Serum Progesterone (P) levels at the end of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (i.e. the day of triggering) have been related to cycle outcome, in terms of ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates. Large cohort studies show that P levels above a certain threshold are associated with poorer cycle outcome. The mechanisms behind P elevation are not well understood yet. It has been shown that P levels are positively related to ovarian response and to the dose of FSH given during COS. Furthermore, it has been well documented that P levels at the end of stimulation are significantly higher when recombinant (r) FSH is used for COS when compared to HMG, either in a GnRH agonist long protocol or in a GnRH antagonist protocol. Some authors suggest that this finding is explained by the fact that COS with rFSH provides a higher oocyte yield than when hMG is given, so the higher P levels observed would be explained by the larger number of follicles developed when rFSH is used. On the other hand, other authors explain this event by a different follicular esteroidogenesis when HMG is used for COS compared to rFSH The hypotheisis behind this assumption is that rFSH enhances P synthesis from its precursor pregnenolone in the granulosa cells. This P is unable to be further metabolized into androgens because of the lack of 17-20 lyase in the human granulosa cells, and therefore is delivered into circulation. On the other hand, when HMG is given for COS, the ∆4 pathway is promoted, and pregnenolone will be catabolized in to Dehidroepiandrostenodione (DHEA), in the theca cells, and this one to Androstenodione, which will be finally aromatized in to estrogens. This mechanism will explain the lower P and higher E2 levels observed in HMG cycles in comparison to rFSH cycles.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesSpain
CollaboratorsRoche Pharma AG

Timeline

Phase 4CompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 14, 2016
Enrollment StartOct 18, 2016
Primary CompletionJun 15, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.7 yearsPosted 10.2 years ago

Interventions

COS with GnRH antagonists and rFSHdrug

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and rFSH in women with normal ovarian function.

COS with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMGdrug

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH antagonists and HP-HMG in women with normal ovarian function.