CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 7,407 enrolled
Drug / intervention
External inspection of health servicesbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02747121
NCT02747121N/ACompleted

Effects of External Inspection on Sepsis Detection and Treatment

Norwegian Board of Health Supervision·interventional·Posted Apr 21, 2016·Updated Mar 24, 2022

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating External inspection of health services for Sepsis. Completed, enrolled 7,407 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

External inspections are widely used as means to improve the quality of care. Despite their widespread use, there is limited knowledge about whether and how they affect the quality of care. This study uses inspection with detection and treatment of sepsis in hospitals as a case to evaluate the effect of inspections on the quality of care and to explore how inspections affect the hospitals.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsSepsis
CountriesNorway

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 21, 2016
Enrollment StartApr 1, 2016
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4.7 yearsPosted 10.2 years ago

Interventions

External inspection of health servicesbehavioral

The intervention is external inspections of acute hospitals addressing early detection and treatment of sepsis. The intervention is delivered on an organizational level. Individuals are not assigned to an intervention. The investigator use data from individuals to assess if the organizational intervention affects care. Therefore the investigator argues that that the study is observational. The inspection will have two components, a system revision and a follow up audit with verification of patient records 8 months later. The inspection can be considered a complex intervention. The study does not intend to evaluate the individual effects of the different components of the inspection, rather the effect of the inspection as a whole.