At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 24 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Lidocainedrug
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Pilot Study: Comparison of Buffered 1% vs. Non-Buffered 2% Lidocaine Used in Dental and Oral Surgical Procedures: Clinical Outcomes Maxilla
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Lidocaine for Anesthesia. Completed, enrolled 24 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Anecdotal data suggest that the buffered form of the local anesthetic is more potent at equal dosages, and a lower dosage of the buffered drug might be used with an effect equal to higher dosage not buffered. Clinical data are needed to confirm these anecdotal data. No published data exist comparing buffered local anesthetics at lower drug concentrations to current dosages commonly used in dental and oral surgical procedures
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsAnesthesia
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 2016
Enrollment StartMay 2016
Primary CompletionDec 2017
TodayJul 2026
First PostedApr 21, 2016
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2016
Primary CompletionDec 31, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.7 yearsPosted 10.2 years ago
Interventions
Lidocainedrug
Intraoral maxillary field block