At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 308 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Traditional sitting position +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison Between Pendant Position and Traditional Sitting Position for Successful Spinal Puncture in Spinal Anaesthesia for Cesarean Section
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Traditional sitting position and Pendant position for Pregnancy, Caesarean Section. Completed, enrolled 308 participants.
Detailed Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the successful spinal puncture among patients with pendant position in comparison with those who used traditional sitting position for caesarean section.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPregnancy, Caesarean Section
Countries--
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartAug 2014
Primary CompletionOct 2014
First PostedApr 2016
TodayJul 2026
First PostedApr 28, 2016
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2014
Primary CompletionOct 1, 2014
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 monthsPosted 10.2 years ago
Interventions
Traditional sitting positionprocedure
Subjects were set on traditional sitting position before spinal anesthesia begun.
Pendant positionprocedure
Subjects were set on pendant position before spinal anesthesia begun.