At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 60 enrolled
Drug / intervention
USG +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Cole Formula in Predicting Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Diameter
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating USG and Cole Formula for General Anesthesia. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This study aims to compare the accuracy of measurement between ultrasonography and Cole formula in predicting uncuffed endotracheal tube diameter.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsGeneral Anesthesia
CountriesIndonesia
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedApr 2016
Enrollment StartMay 2016
Primary CompletionJul 2016
TodayJul 2026
First PostedApr 28, 2016
Enrollment StartMay 1, 2016
Primary CompletionJul 1, 2016
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2 monthsPosted 10.2 years ago
Interventions
USGdevice
USG used was SonoSite® M-Turbo Bothell, WA, USA, probe linear (Array HFL 38 frekuensi 6-13 MHz). Internal subglottic diameter equals external diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube or trachea diameter, result rounded to the smallest uncuffed endotracheal tube size.
Cole Formulaother
Internal diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube equals (age in years/4) + 4mm.