At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Standard Catheter Directed Thrombolysis vs. Ultrasound Assisted Thrombolysis for Patients With Acute Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating CDT without ultrasound acceleration and CDT with ultrasound acceleration for Pulmonary Embolism. Completed, enrolled 77 participants across 4 sites.
Detailed Summary
The study will compare standard catheter directed thrombolysis to ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis for the treatment of acute submassive pulmonary embolism (PE). The study population will include patients eligible for catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) for submassive PE. Subjects will be randomized to, either, standard catheter-directed thrombolysis or ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis (USAT).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
A pulmonary arteriogram will be performed. Upon confirmation of the pulmonary embolus a standard infusion catheter will be placed within the clot. The catheter will be used for infusion of thrombolytics to treat/dissolve the pulmonary embolus.
A pulmonary arteriogram will be performed. Upon confirmation of the pulmonary embolus an infusion catheter that incorporates an ultrasound emitting wire will be placed within the clot. The catheter will be used for infusion of thrombolytics to treat/dissolve the pulmonary embolus. The wire will be connected to an ultrasound generating device.