At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparative Study Between Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy and Open Pancreatico-duodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and Open pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Completed, enrolled 40 participants.
Detailed Summary
Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for a wide array of periampullary and pancreatic diseases including malignant and benign conditions. The outcome of PD has improved over the last two decades due to advances in surgical techniques, anesthesia and perioperative care. Although studies from high volume centers demonstrate reduce in the operative mortality to less than 3%, the postoperative morbidity rate is still ranging from 30% to 60%. Laparoscopic surgery is being used increasingly as a less invasive alternative to traditional interventions for pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is a difficult procedure that has become increasingly popular. Nevertheless, comparative data on outcomes remain limited. In this prospective randomized study, investigators evaluate the safety and feasibility of surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive PD compared to conventional open PD.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy 1. dissection 2. reconstruction
Open pancreaticoduodenectomy