At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Minimally-invasive Surgery Versus Craniotomy in Patients With Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Endoscopic Evacuation, Stereotactic Aspiration, and 1 other intervention for Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive. Completed, enrolled 733 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The effectiveness of craniotomy in the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage remains controversial. Two main types of minimally invasive surgery, endoscopic evacuation and stereotactic aspiration, have been attempted for hematoma removal and show some advantages. However, prospective and controlled studies are still lacking. This is a multi-center randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether minimally invasive hematoma evacuation with endoscopic or stereotactic aspiration will improve the outcome in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage compared with small-boneflap craniotomy. Patients will be randomly assigned to endoscopy group, stereotactic aspiration group or small-boneflap craniotomy group in a 1:1:1 ratio.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Endoscopic surgery for treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Using image guidance to aspirate hematoma.
Craniotomy with a big bone flap to evacuate intracerebral hematoma.