At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 60 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Real-time Ultrasound-guided +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison Between Real-Time Ultrasound Guidance vs Anatomical Landmark Technique on the Efficacy of Paramedian Spinal Anaesthesia
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Real-time Ultrasound-guided and Anatomical Landmark Technique for Wounds and Injuries. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of real-time ultrasound guidance on spinal anesthesia vs the traditional anatomical landmark technique, by comparing success rate of spinal needle insertion, success rate rate of single needle pass, duration and immediate complications.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsWounds and Injuries
CountriesMalaysia
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartJun 2014
Primary CompletionMay 2015
Study CompletionJul 2015
First PostedJul 2016
TodayJul 2026
First PostedJul 12, 2016
Enrollment StartJun 1, 2014
Primary CompletionMay 1, 2015
Study CompletionJul 1, 2015
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 11 monthsPosted 10.0 years ago
Interventions
Real-time Ultrasound-guidedprocedure
Real-time ultrasound guided paramedian spinal anesthesia
Anatomical Landmark Techniqueprocedure
Conventional anatomical landmark technique for paramedian spinal anesthesia