CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 359 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Vouchersbehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02843178
NCT02843178N/ACompleted

Coupons for Healthy Intake Using Variable Economic Strategies (CHIVES)

Stanford University·interventional·Posted Jul 25, 2016·Updated Aug 28, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Vouchers for Cardiovascular Diseases. Completed, enrolled 359 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Improving diets through increased food and vegetable (F\&V) consumption significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Programs increasing the accessibility and affordability of F\&Vs among low-income Americans have been hindered by the food consumption cycle associated with poverty: the tendency to over-consume calories shortly after receiving funds at the beginning of each month, draining the budget for F\&V purchases, or for all food purchases, by month's end. An emerging theory about dietary behavior suggests that providing funds for food in smaller installments distributed throughout the month will smooth the consumption cycle and improve healthy eating-counteracting the tendency to respond to lump sum, once-monthly funding installments by purchasing calorie-dense foods immediately after funds are received. The theory also suggests that funds targeted toward specific healthy foods (e.g., F\&Vs) will improve diets more than untargeted funds, despite the inconvenience of utilizing targeted funds. We will rigorously test both hypotheses in a real-world setting by comparing alternative approaches for delivering food purchasing vouchers. We have established and tested the infrastructure to provide vouchers accepted by numerous food sellers (e.g., supermarkets, corner shops) in low-income neighborhoods. Leveraging this infrastructure, we will conduct a randomized trial with a two-by-two factorial design, comparing $20 of vouchers valid for one month to four $5 vouchers each valid for a sequential week of the month (lump sum versus distributed funding), and comparing vouchers restricted to F\&V purchases to vouchers redeemable for any food (targeted versus untargeted funding). Low-income adults (N=288) recruited through our community partners will be randomized to one of four 6-month interventions: monthly targeted, monthly untargeted, weekly targeted, or weekly untargeted vouchers. Participants will be assessed through efficient verbal 24-hour dietary recalls validated among low-literacy populations, to determine daily consumption of F\&Vs and metrics of overall dietary quality at months 0, 6 and 12 (6 months after vouchers end). Additional surveys will identify moderators and mediators of dietary improvement.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJul 25, 2016
Enrollment StartDec 1, 2016
Primary CompletionOct 9, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.9 yearsPosted 9.9 years ago

Interventions

Vouchersbehavioral

A voucher is given that can be used at the cashier of participating grocery stores, corner stores, and farmer's markets, enabling a participant to have the voucher's value subtracted from their grocery bill.