At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Clinical Performance of 4 mm Short Distal Implants in Fixed Cross-Arch Prostheses - An Open, Randomized, Controlled Study
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Roxolid short implant, 4 mm length (4) and Roxolid short implant, 4 mm length (2) for Jaw Edentulous. Completed, enrolled 53 participants across 2 sites in 2 countries.
Detailed Summary
This study aims to compare the clinical performance of 4 mm short implants supporting cross-arch fixed reconstructions in the edentulous mandible either with a combination of two short implants as distal support and two implants of conventional length placed in the interforaminal region, or with a combination of four short implants as distal support and two interforaminal implants of conventional length.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Placement of a combination of four short implants (in positions 35/45, 36/46) as distal support and two implants of conventional length (in positions 33/43) in the interforaminal region, in order to support a cross-arch fixed screw-retained prosthesis.
Placement of a combination of two short implants (in positions 36/46) as distal support and two implants of conventional length (in positions 33/43) in the interforaminal region, in order to support a cross-arch fixed screw-retained prosthesis.