CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 295 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Iodine Mapping using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography versus Dual Energy Computed Tomographydevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02890706
NCT02890706N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Iodine Mapping Using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography Versus Dual Energy Computed Tomography

Radboud University Medical Center·interventional·Posted Sep 7, 2016·Updated Nov 7, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Iodine Mapping using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography versus Dual Energy Computed Tomography for Pulmonary Embolism. Completed, enrolled 295 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Comparing two techniques (Subtraction and Dual Energy CT) for functional Chest CT for patients with suspected with pulmonary embolism.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPulmonary Embolism
CountriesNetherlands
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 7, 2016
Enrollment StartJul 7, 2016
Primary CompletionOct 30, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 9.8 years ago

Interventions

Iodine Mapping using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography versus Dual Energy Computed Tomographydevice

Compare two techniques of the CT scanner