At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Effect of a Diagnostic Imaging Utilization Report on Family Physician Ordering Practices in the Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Usual QCNL DI utilization report, New DI utilization report, and 1 other intervention for Diagnostic Imaging Utilization. Completed, enrolled 192 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Diagnostic imaging (DI) tests (for example, x-ray tests, ultrasounds, CT scans, or MRIs) are used by health care providers to help diagnose patient illness, but decisions regarding when these tests should be ordered are subjective. As a result, some physicians order these tests more than others. Ordering rates between clinicians seeing similar kinds of patients have been shown to be considerably different, suggesting that many of the tests are unnecessary. DI currently accounts for about 6.6% of Canadian hospital budgets, but this percentage may be much higher in Newfoundland where test ordering rates are almost twice the national average. However, cost is not the only concern. Over-testing can lead to further unnecessary testing to follow-up on harmless findings, and in the case of CT, large doses of potentially harmful radiation. We suspect that many clinicians are not aware that they order more DI tests than their peers. We will therefore develop a "report card" for family physicians in the province that shows them how many tests they are ordering compared to other physicians in the region. We expect that physicians who are over-ordering DI tests will reduce the number of tests they order after receiving their report cards. This is a low-cost way to potentially prevent expensive over-ordering of DI tests that can easily be implemented in the province's other health regions and elsewhere. The Quality of Care Newfoundland and Labrador (QCNL) organization in the province currently provides feedback reports and in-person detailing sessions to physicians, but the effectiveness of these interventions has not been studied.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
See arm descriptions.
See arm descriptions.
In-person detailing, usually with a small group of family physicians and a peer (physician) facilitator to discuss the topic over a 30-60 minute period.