CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 1 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Sidekick Stubbiesdevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02921295
NCT02921295N/ACompleted

A Comparative Analysis Between College Park Sidekick Feet and Conventional Stubby Prosthesis

Angela DeCandia·interventional·Posted Oct 3, 2016·Updated Jun 21, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Sidekick Stubbies for Amputation Stumps. Completed, enrolled 1 participant across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the College Park Sidekicks to conventional stubby prosthetics to investigate their effects on bilateral above-knee-amputee gait velocity, exertion, and balance. The investigators aim to demonstrate that: (i) greater balance will be observed and reported on a level and gravel surface with the Sidekicks; (ii) time to complete the 10-meter walk test will be decreased wearing Sidekicks compared to the conventional stubby prosthesis; and (iii) subjects will report feeling less exerted with the sidekicks.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedOct 3, 2016
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2016
Primary CompletionApr 1, 2017
Study CompletionApr 28, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 7 monthsPosted 9.7 years ago

Interventions

Sidekick Stubbiesdevice