CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 114 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Non-Invasive Ventilation +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT02977572
NCT02977572N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Relating to Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema in an Intensive Care Unit

Hospital General Universitario de Castellón·interventional·Posted Nov 30, 2016·Updated Jul 21, 2017

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Non-Invasive Ventilation and Continuous Positive AirwayPressure CPAP for Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema. Completed, enrolled 114 participants.

Detailed Summary

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that an Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) performs better than a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in the management of Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema (CPE) within an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsCardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024202520262027
First PostedNov 30, 2016
Enrollment StartJul 1, 2007
Primary CompletionDec 1, 2010
Study CompletionJan 1, 2011
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.4 yearsPosted 9.6 years ago

Interventions

Non-Invasive Ventilationdevice

In arm description

Continuous Positive AirwayPressure CPAPdevice

In arm description