At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
CompaRison of Paresthesia Mapping to anatomIc Midline-based burSt Programming Strategies
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Paresthesia mapping lead evaluation first and Anatomical midline lead evaluation first for Chronic Pain. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 2 sites.
Detailed Summary
The study will compare therapeutic efficacy of a novel spinal cord stimulation leads implant based on anatomical landmarks with standard surgical implantation technique.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Subjects will evaluate the clinical efficacy of stimulation delivered using the lead implanted using paresthesia mapping in the first part of the SCS trial and using the lead implanted using anatomical midline placement in the second part of the SCS trial
Subjects will evaluate the clinical efficacy of stimulation delivered using the lead implanted using anatomical midline in the first part of the SCS trial and using the lead implanted using paresthesia mapping placement in the second part of the SCS trial