At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Miller and Macintosh Laryngoscopes, CMAC and Glidescope Videolaryngoscopes in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Miller, Macintosh, and 2 other interventions for Videolaryngoscopes (VL) and 2 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 43 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
This study will compare the CMAC and Glidescope videolaryngoscopes (VL) to traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL) using either a Miller or Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of users. This will involve the use of an intubating pediatric manikin to assess various aspects of endotracheal intubation by experienced and inexperienced users.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using direct laryngoscopy (DL) with a Miller laryngoscope
Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using DL with a Macintosh laryngoscope
Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the C-MAC video laryngoscope
Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the GlideScope video laryngoscope