At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Assessment of the Effectiveness of Guided by a Physiotherapist Versus Non-guided Pelvic Floor Exercises for Urinary Incontinence (UI) in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting (RR) Multiple Sclerosis
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Pelvic floor exercises guided by a physiotherapist and Non guided pelvic floor exercises for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis and Urinary Incontinence. Completed, enrolled 48 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of guided versus non guided pelvic floor exercises for urinary incontinence in patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Subjects perform two types of contractions of the pelvic floor in two different positions 3 times a day and once a week they check it with a physiotherapist (this day only they do it twice at home)
Subjects perform two types of contractions of the pelvic floor in two different positions 3 times a day. They do not attend to meetings with a physiotherapist