CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 101 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03008811
NCT03008811N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Norwegian Randomized Study of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (NO PERS-AF)

Haukeland University Hospital·interventional·Posted Jan 2, 2017·Updated Nov 12, 2021

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter. and Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation. for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Completed, enrolled 101 participants across 3 sites.

Detailed Summary

This study will compare efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon catheter versus a radiofrequency ablation with a contact force sensing catheter for treatment of patients with persistent or longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPersistent Atrial Fibrillation
CountriesNorway
CollaboratorsSt. Olavs Hospital, University Hospital of North Norway

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 2, 2017
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2016
Primary CompletionApr 1, 2021
Study CompletionMay 1, 2021
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4.4 yearsPosted 9.5 years ago

Interventions

Pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon catheter.procedure

Device: Arctic Front Advance™ cardiac cryoablation catheter system.

Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation.procedure

Device: TactiCath™ Quartz irrigated ablation catheter (St. Jude Medical) with aid of 3-D mapping system (EnSite Precision, St. Jude Medical).