At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Subchondroplasty® Procedure With Arthroscopy Versus Arthroscopy Alone for Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions in the Knee
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Subchondroplasty with Arthroscopy and Arthroscopy Alone for Bone Marrow Edema and 4 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 131 participants across 13 sites in 2 countries.
Detailed Summary
This is a multi-center, prospective, single-blinded, two-arm study, randomized to include approximately 134 subjects treated with Subchondroplasty (SCP) + Arthroscopy and 67 subjects with arthroscopy alone. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate superiority of Subchondroplasty with arthroscopy compared to arthroscopy alone for treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions (BMLs) in the knee.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The Subchondroplasty® (SCP®) Procedure targets and fills bone defects with AccuFill® Bone Substitute Material utilizing an arthroscopic / percutaneous approach. Using intraoperative fluoroscopy, the bone defect is localized relative to MRI findings The appropriate AccuPort® Delivery Cannula is drilled to the bone defect. AccuFill® Bone Substitute Material is then injected into the subchondral bone defect. The calcium phosphate (CaP) fills the edematous void and hardens within the Bone Marrow Lesion. The CaP is resorbed over time and replaced with new bone during the healing process.
An endoscopic examination, therapy and surgery of the knee joint.