CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 40 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Bilateral Salpingectomy +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03135431
NCT03135431N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Safety of Salpingectomy vs Tubal Ligation

Mayo Clinic·interventional·Posted May 1, 2017·Updated Jul 10, 2019

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Bilateral Salpingectomy and Bilateral Tubal Ligation for Contraception. Completed, enrolled 40 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety of performing a bilateral tubal ligation vs. bilateral salpingectomy, two procedures performed for permanent sterilization, at the time of cesarean delivery. The investigators want to determine if performing bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery poses any greater risk for blood loss, as compared to a bilateral tubal ligation.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsContraception
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 1, 2017
Enrollment StartMay 17, 2017
Primary CompletionMay 19, 2018
Study CompletionJul 30, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.0 yearsPosted 9.2 years ago

Interventions

Bilateral Salpingectomyprocedure

Surgical removal of entire fallopian tubes

Bilateral Tubal Ligationprocedure

Surgical tying, cutting, or removal of a portion of the fallopian tubes