CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 1,221 enrolled
Drug / intervention
screening colonoscopyprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03137277
NCT03137277N/ACompleted

A Randomized Comparative Study Between Two Instrument Generations to Improve Adenoma Detection in Screening Colonoscopy

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf·observational·Posted May 2, 2017·Updated Jun 7, 2019

In Brief

An observational study evaluating screening colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection Rate. Completed, enrolled 1,221 participants across 7 sites.

Detailed Summary

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the most important parameter to measure outcome quality of (screening) colonoscopy. Since single improvements of imaging have not been able to improve ADR in many randomized studies, the present study tested the hypothesis that only multiple imaging improvements such as seen with two generation changes of colonoscopies - i.e. skipping one colonoscope generation - may be necessary before improvements in ADR can be measured. The investigators will test this hypothesis in the present randomized tandem study in 7 private practices in Hamburg and Berlin, in a pure screening colonoscopy setting, aiming at inclusion of 1200 patients \> age of 55 years (screening colonoscopy cut-off in Germany). Exclusion criteria are symptomatic patients and colonoscopies planned for therapeutic reasons. Main outcome parameter is the ADR (rate of patients with at least one adenoma/all patients).

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesGermany
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 2, 2017
Enrollment StartNov 1, 2013
Primary CompletionSep 1, 2016
Study CompletionJul 1, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.8 yearsPosted 9.2 years ago

Interventions

screening colonoscopyprocedure

Introduction and forwarding of the device up to caecum/terminal ileum. Then withdrawal and inspection of colonic wall. Biopsies and polypectomies if necessary. overall and diagnostic (only withdrawal) times being recorded separately. Polyps are documented with regards to location (caecum, ascending, transverse and descending colon, sigmoid and rectum), size (open forceps or snare for comparison) and morphology using the Paris classification (polypoid pedunculated or sessile, non-polypoid slightly elevated/flat/depressed, ulcerous) Polyps were then resected using biopsy forceps or cold snare (for polyps \< 5 mm), or conventional polypectomy according to local standards.