CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 32 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Customized patient instruments +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03148379
NCT03148379N/ACompleted

A Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Surgical and Economic Parameters of Total Knee Replacement Performed With Single-use Efficiency Instruments With Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Versus Traditional Metal Instruments With Conventional Surgical Technique.

Medacta USA·interventional·Posted May 11, 2017·Updated Aug 8, 2023

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Customized patient instruments and Traditional Metal Instruments for Osteoarthritis. Completed, enrolled 32 participants across 5 sites.

Detailed Summary

To compare economic factors and the rate of adverse events between two types of instrumentation used for total knee replacement: Single-use Efficiency Instruments with Patient Specific Technique (MyKnee®) Traditional Metal Instruments with Conventional Surgical Technique

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsOsteoarthritis
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 11, 2017
Enrollment StartOct 11, 2017
Primary CompletionMar 30, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4.5 yearsPosted 9.1 years ago

Interventions

Customized patient instrumentsdevice

Single use efficiency instruments and cutting blocks specifically made for each patient using pre-op MRI or CT scans to make bone cuts and select implant size.

Traditional Metal Instrumentsdevice

Traditional metal instrument will be used to make bone cuts and size the components in this control group.