At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 114 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Lotrafilcon B contact lenses +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
One-month Clinical Comparison of Silicone Hydrogel Monthly Lenses in High Lipid Depositors
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Lotrafilcon B contact lenses and Senofilcon C contact lenses for Refractive Error. Completed, enrolled 114 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare AIR OPTIX® plus HydraGlyde (AOHG) contact lenses to ACUVUE® VITA® (VITA) contact lenses for total lipid uptake (total of surface and bulk uptake) after 30 days of wear by high lipid depositors.
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsRefractive Error
CountriesUnited Kingdom
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 2017
Enrollment StartSep 2017
Primary CompletionJul 2018
TodayJul 2026
First PostedMay 30, 2017
Enrollment StartSep 22, 2017
Primary CompletionJul 19, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 10 monthsPosted 9.1 years ago
Interventions
Lotrafilcon B contact lensesdevice
Silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as per their Conformité Européenne (CE) marking
Senofilcon C contact lensesdevice
Silicone hydrogel contact lenses used as per their Conformité Européenne (CE) marking