CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 182 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Cooral™ +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03203733
NCT03203733N/ACompleted

Cryoprotection of Chemotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, a Randomized Study

Uppsala University·interventional·Posted Jun 29, 2017·Updated Nov 20, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Cooral™ and cryotherapy for Cryotherapy Effect. Completed, enrolled 182 participants across 5 sites in 2 countries.

Detailed Summary

This study evaluates, among study patients with lymphoma or myeloma undergoing autologous SCT, whether cooling oral mucosa with a cooling device compared with ice cubes/crushed ice or ice pop succeeds in reducing the degree of oral mucositis (OM) according to the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) total,degree of OM according to World Health Organisation (WHO), tolerability of either cooling method. The study is also aiming to , patients subjective experience of OM, rating of general quality of life and oral pain, number of days with total parenteral nutrition (TPN), number of hospital days, total dose of opioids, and C reactive protein during time in care. Finally, the study aims to evaluate weight loss, Leukocyte particle concentration, number of days until bone marrow response, S-albumin, and body temperature.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesNorway, Sweden
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJun 29, 2017
Enrollment StartJun 12, 2017
Primary CompletionDec 6, 2019
Study CompletionDec 31, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 2.5 yearsPosted 9.0 years ago

Interventions

Cooral™device

An intraoral cooling device which is as effective as ice but with better patient comfort. The cooling device has the advantage that the water temperature can be modified. It enables that the unacceptable low temperatures that occur with ice cooling can be avoided.

cryotherapyother

Oral cooling by ice chips or crushed ice or ice pop