At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison Between Dorsal Root Ganglion Thermal Radiofrequency Versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Management of Intractable Metastatic Pain in Thoracic Vertebral Body
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating PRF on DRG, TRF on DRG, and 1 other intervention for Bone Neoplasm,Malignant Vertebral Column Thoracic Secondary. Completed, enrolled 69 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
AIM OF THE WORK To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Pulsed and Thermal Radiofrequency lesion of the dorsal root ganglion (RF-DRG) on a consecutive group of patients presenting with chronic thoracic pain due to vertebral bone metastasis.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
RF will be performed with the patient in a prone position with mild flexion of the spine. Fluoroscopy beam positioned in an antero-posterior direction. A 10 cm RF needle 20 G with a 10 mm active tip.The needle is inserted in a slightly medial-cephalad direction under the transverse processes, and using lateral fluoroscopic imaging, incrementally walking into the thoracic intervertebral foramen. So the location of the needle tip confirmed by sensory stimulation at 50 Hz. The point of maximum stimulation is at 0.5 V intensity and this is designated to be the location of the DRG. Slight redirection can be done to optimize the stimulation; injection of contrast reveals epidural uptake. After establishing the site for the RF, 1 ml 2% lidocaine should be injected through the needle.
Similar to the group of " PRF on DRG", but the types of the waves will be different as previously described
Similar to the previous groups, but without applying any type of Radio-frequency but just injecting steroids and local anesthetics as previously described