CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 47 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Cytologic techniques used for rapid on site interpretationother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03224910
NCT03224910N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Diagnostic Efficiency of Needle Core Biopsy Touch Imprints Versus Fine Needle Aspiration Smears at the Time of Rapid on Site Interpretation

University of Mississippi Medical Center·observational·Posted Jul 21, 2017·Updated May 7, 2018

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Cytologic techniques used for rapid on site interpretation for Diagnostic Self Evaluation. Completed, enrolled 47 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Cytopathologists work along with radiologist in the diagnosis of lesions. Rapid on site interpretation (ROSE) of fine needle aspiration (FNA) smears of radiologically suspicious lesions is a common clinical practice. In the last years, the investigators have seen trend towards needle core biopsies of radiologically suspicious lesions. The investigators want to analyze the challenges of rapid on site interpretation of touch imprints (TI) of needle core biopsies (NCB) versus fine needle aspiration smears.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsDiagnostic Self Evaluation
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJul 21, 2017
Enrollment StartJul 18, 2017
Primary CompletionMay 2, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 8.9 years ago

Interventions

Cytologic techniques used for rapid on site interpretationother

Diagnostic efficiency of touch imprints of needle core biopsies vs smears of fine needle aspirations during rapid on-site interpretation