At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of Safety, Efficacy, and Patient-perceived Satisfaction Between Initial Routine Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Insertion and General Intravenous Access in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients: A Randomized Phase II Study
In Brief
A Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter and Intravenous Access. Completed, enrolled 66 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
To establish the IV access strategy for terminally ill cancer patients, using comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (optional PICC group).
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
comparisons of the safety, efficacy, and patient-perceived satisfaction between the initially routine PICC insertion group (routine PICC group) and general IV access group (general IV group)