CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 60 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Percutaneous pinning timeprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03311633
NCT03311633N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Distal Radius Fracture: Comparison Between Three and Six Weeks of Percutaneous Fixation

Carlos A Acosta-Olivo·interventional·Posted Oct 17, 2017·Updated May 8, 2024

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Percutaneous pinning time for Radius Fracture Distal. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 2 sites.

Detailed Summary

BACKGROUND. Distal radius fractures (FRD) are up to 17% of all diagnosed fractures and are the most commonly treated fractures in adult orthopedic patients. The management could be either conservative or surgical, depending on AO bone fracture classification. The principles of good treatment involves an anatomical reduction with a proper immobilization that keep the reduction. OBJECTIVE. Determine if percutaneous pinning for six weeks versus three has major complications in distal radius fractures.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsRadius Fracture Distal
CountriesMexico
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedOct 17, 2017
Enrollment StartSep 29, 2017
Primary CompletionApr 20, 2024
Study CompletionApr 23, 2024
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6.6 yearsPosted 8.7 years ago

Interventions

Percutaneous pinning timeprocedure

Percutaneous pinning time will be compared in two groups: 3 versus 6 weeks.