At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Comparison of a Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap and Conventional Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Gingival Recession- A Split-mouth, Randomized Prospective Comparative Controlled Clinical Trial
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating semilunar coronally positioned flap and coronally advanced flap for Gingival Recession and Root Coverage. Completed, enrolled 10 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
A clinical evaluation of using the semilunar coronally position flap (SCPF) compared to the conventional coronally advanced flap (CAF) with modification to treat class I Miller gingival recession. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite. The sample size will be ten patients. Each patient has bilateral Miller Class I gingival recessions; one will be treated with SCPF, while the other will be treated with CAF
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
The description of this intervention has been already given before
The description of this intervention has been already given before