CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 90 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Mini Gastric Bypass +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03412149
NCT03412149N/ACompleted

Malabsorption and Gut Microbiota Profile Changes After Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass (MGB) vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB): a Prospective Multicenter Comparative Study

University of Roma La Sapienza·interventional·Posted Jan 26, 2018·Updated Apr 28, 2021

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Mini Gastric Bypass and Roux en Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity (Disorder). Completed, enrolled 90 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Bariatric surgery represents the best therapeutic option to induce sustainable weight loss and to solve serious comorbidities improving the life-expectancy and the quality of life. Actually the choice of the procedure is based on the surgeon's and patients preference . Mini gastric bypass(MGB) is an emerging procedure offering excellent results in terms of weight loss and comorbidities (mainly metabolic) control. On the other hand, recent data indicated that the gut microbiota may mediate some of the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery and changes in the composition and diversity of the gut microbiota have been observed after RY Gastric Bypass (RYGB) in humans as well as in mice. However, there are no prospective investigations on Gut Microbiota changes after MGB, despite the procedure is described as "malabsorptive" and there are no studies comparing gut microbiota shift and malabsorption entity in humans after RYGB vs MGB. Thereafter prospective data on the incidence of bile reflux esophageal lesions after MGB are lacking. The aim of the present multicentric prospective comparative study is to evaluate malabsorption and gut microbiota shift after laparoscopic RYGB vs MGB at 1 year.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesItaly
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 26, 2018
Enrollment StartMar 21, 2018
Primary CompletionFeb 19, 2020
Study CompletionNov 19, 2020
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.9 yearsPosted 8.4 years ago

Interventions

Mini Gastric Bypassprocedure

Standardization of the techniques will be guaranteed: 1. Mini Gastric Bypass Arm 2. Roux en Y Gastric Bypass arm All patients will have intraoperative measurement of the whole length of bowel from Treitz ligament to the ileocecal junction (expected range 6-8 m).The common limb will be therefore about 2/3 of total small bowel length.

Roux en Y Gastric Bypassprocedure

Standardization of the techniques will be guaranteed: 1. Mini Gastric Bypass Arm 2. Roux en Y Gastric Bypass arm All patients will have intraoperative measurement of the whole length of bowel from Treitz ligament to the ileocecal junction (expected range 6-8 m).The common limb will be therefore about 2/3 of total small bowel length.