CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 10 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Foot IPC +3 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03420625
NCT03420625N/ACompleted

Haemodynamic Effects of Different Mechanical Compression Devices and Neuromuscular Stimulation in the Lower Limb

Karolinska University Hospital·interventional·Posted Feb 5, 2018·Updated Sep 23, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Foot IPC, Rapid calf IPC, and 2 other interventions for Venous Stasis and Deep Vein Thrombosis. Completed, enrolled 10 participants.

Detailed Summary

In this study, four different devices which stimulate the blood in the lower extremities are used in ten healthy persons while measuring the blood flow with ultrasound. The aim is to study the haemodynamic effects in the lower extremities of each modality and also to compare those effects between the four modalities in order to identify those which most effective than the others.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
Countries--
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 5, 2018
Enrollment StartSep 1, 2016
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2017
Study CompletionFeb 1, 2017
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 4 monthsPosted 8.4 years ago

Interventions

Foot IPCdevice

Intermittent pneumatic compression in the foot using the A-V Impulse™, Covidien®, New Haven, CT, USA

Rapid calf IPCdevice

Intermittent pneumatic compression in the calf using the VenaFlow® Elite, DJO Global, USA

Slow calf IPCdevice

Intermittent pneumatic compression in the calf using the Kendall SCD™ 700, Covidien, Medtronic, USA

Calf NMESdevice

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the calf using the DJOTM, CefarCompex Mi-Theta 500 stimulator