CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 82 enrolled
Drug / intervention
MyKnee with single use Efficiency Instrument +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03427047
NCT03427047N/ACompleted

A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Surgical and Economic Parameters of Total Knee Replacement Performed Using Two Different Surgical Techniques: Medacta MyKnee® Surgical Technique Using Efficiency Single-use Instruments Versus Stryker Navigation Surgical Technique Performed With Conventional Metal Instruments.

Medacta USA·interventional·Posted Feb 9, 2018·Updated Jun 13, 2023

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating MyKnee with single use Efficiency Instrument and Stryker Navigational with conventional metal instruments for Osteo Arthritis Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasty. Completed, enrolled 82 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Randomized study comparing surgical and economic parameter of Total Knee Arthroplasty performed using two different specific surgical techniques.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedFeb 9, 2018
Enrollment StartAug 1, 2018
Primary CompletionJan 1, 2022
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.4 yearsPosted 8.4 years ago

Interventions

MyKnee with single use Efficiency Instrumentdevice

Total Knee Arthroplasty utilizing a CT scan for customization of cutting blocks with single use instrumentation

Stryker Navigational with conventional metal instrumentsdevice

Total Knee Arthroplasty without customization of cutting blocks using conventional metal instruments.