CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 64 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy +1 moredevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03464929
NCT03464929N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes

Fundación para la Investigación Biosanitaria del Principado de Asturias·observational·Posted Mar 14, 2018·Updated Feb 26, 2019

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Airtraq indirect laryngoscopy and King Vision indirect laryngoscopy for Intubation and Laryngoscopy. Completed, enrolled 64 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Several videolaryngoscopes have been developed but few have been compared in terms of their learning curves and efficacy. The aim of this study is to compare the learning curves of Airtraq versus King Vision in a group of residents trained in direct laryngoscopy. Four residents will perform, after a short training in manikin, 8 intubations with each device. The sequence of use of the devices will be randomized. Outcome measures will be duration of intubation attempt, glottic visualization and percentage of intubation success.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsIntubation, Laryngoscopy
CountriesSpain
CollaboratorsHospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Fundación Asturcor

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMar 14, 2018
Enrollment StartJan 15, 2018
Primary CompletionOct 25, 2018
Study CompletionFeb 25, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 9 monthsPosted 8.3 years ago

Interventions

Airtraq indirect laryngoscopydevice

Attempt to intubation using the Airtraq device

King Vision indirect laryngoscopydevice

Attempt to intubation using the King Vision device