At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordN/ACompleted· 106 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Interpretation Modality: In Person +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.
Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Urogynecological Office Visits and Patient Satisfaction of Limited English-Proficient Patients With Phone Interpreter Services Compared to In-Person Interpreters: Randomized Controlled Trial (SIPI)
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Interpretation Modality: In Person and Interpretation Modality: Telephonic for Pelvic Floor Disorders. Completed, enrolled 106 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
The aim of the study is to determine if In-person interpreters increases patient satisfaction of URGYN office visits compared to the use of phone interpreter services for Limited English Proficient (LEP) patients
Study Details
Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPelvic Floor Disorders
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--
Timeline
N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
Enrollment StartDec 2017
First PostedMar 2018
Primary CompletionJun 2019
Study CompletionJun 2019
TodayJul 2026
First PostedMar 19, 2018
Enrollment StartDec 15, 2017
Primary CompletionJun 10, 2019
Study CompletionJun 15, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.5 yearsPosted 8.3 years ago
Interventions
Interpretation Modality: In Personother
Use of In-Person interpretation support for LEP participant during clinical appointment
Interpretation Modality: Telephonicother
Use of telephonic interpretation support for LEP participant during clinical appointment