CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 60 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Scalpel Gingivectomy +2 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03514316
NCT03514316N/ACompleted

Scalpel Versus Laser Gingivectomy in the Management of Periodontal Health During Orthodontic Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

University of Rome Tor Vergata·interventional·Posted May 2, 2018·Updated May 8, 2018

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Scalpel Gingivectomy, Laser Gingivectomy, and 1 other intervention for Orthodontic Appliance Complication and Gingival Overgrowth. Completed, enrolled 60 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances usually develop gingival enlargement (GE). Its development is usually attribute to chronic inflammation, and may cause both esthetic and functional problems for the patient. In many cases, the gingival hyperplasia demands periodontal surgery in order to increase the length of the crown during or after the orthodontic treatment. Previously conventional surgical procedures were performed using a scalpel under local anaesthesia for these procedures. Lately the use of laser has been proposed. The majority of the studies comparing laser gingivectomy with scalpel gingivectomy show some limits: they are not randomized, they are not prospective, and they have no control group. The primary objective of the present investigation was to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of diode laser gingivectomy versus scalpel gingivectomy in the management of periodontal health among patients receiving fixed orthodontic appliance therapy, compared with a non surgical control group.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesItaly
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
2017201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 2, 2018
Enrollment StartFeb 1, 2017
Primary CompletionFeb 28, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.1 yearsPosted 8.2 years ago

Interventions

Scalpel Gingivectomyprocedure

The patients were anesthetized in the area around the teeth which were to undergo the procedure with local anesthesia (Drug: 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 adrenaline). Initially, the Periodontal Probing Depth was measured and when sufficient anesthesia was achieved, biologic width calculation was done by the trans-gingival probing method. Once the amount of gingival tissue to be excised was demarcated, an external bevel incision was performed by using a scalpel blade (Device: scalpel blade No.15) and the gingival tissue was excised. Left out tissue tags and any beads of granulations tissue were removed to attain a smooth surface.

Laser Gingivectomyprocedure

In the Laser Gingivectomy group, the procedure was performed by using a 810 nm diode laser (Device: 810 nm FOX III diode laser) . Though a local anesthetic gel is sufficient considering that the procedure is minimally invasive, the area was adequately anesthetized with 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 adrenaline. The laser unit, comprising of a 300 μm disposable tip, was used in a contact mode with a setting of 1 to 1.5 watts in continuous mode along the demarcated area with a paint brush like strokes progressing slowly to remove the gingival tissue and expose adequate amount of tooth structure. High-volume suction was used to evacuate the laser plume and charred odor

Nonsurgical periodontal treatmentprocedure

In all subjects of the Control Group a full-mouth periodontal debridement was performed at baseline, 1 and 3 months with an ultrasonic scaler. Chlorhexidine prophylaxis (0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate) was also administered twice a day for 2 weeks after the periodontal treatment. Oral-hygiene instructions were reinforced again.