CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 5,217 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Exposed study sitebehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03529214
NCT03529214N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

A Program Evaluation to Measure the Feasibility of the Team Birth Project

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)·interventional·Posted May 18, 2018·Updated May 14, 2025

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Exposed study site for Pregnancy Complications and 3 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 5,217 participants across 4 sites.

Detailed Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a pilot project to improve communication and teamwork and to increase vaginal delivery rates at hospital in the United States

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPregnancy Complications, Cesarean Section Complications, Maternal Complication of Pregnancy, Communication, Multidisciplinary
CountriesUnited States
CollaboratorsBrigham and Women's Hospital

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedMay 18, 2018
Enrollment StartMay 29, 2018
Primary CompletionSep 30, 2019
Study CompletionDec 31, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 1.3 yearsPosted 8.1 years ago

Interventions

Exposed study sitebehavioral

The study sites will pilot the Team Birth Project designed to improve team communication (between providers, as well as providers and patients). The project includes three key implementation steps that involve: preparing local sites for the implementation of the project; training and coaching on the use of the tools; and sustainment through peer coaching and data feedback. A mixed methods approach will be used to assess acceptability and feasibility, including: (1) clinician surveys and interviews, (2) implementation team focus groups, and (3) patient surveys.