CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 78 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Episodic Future Thinking +3 morebehavioral
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03664726
NCT03664726N/ACompleted

Delay Discounting as a Target for Self-Regulation in Prediabetes

Leonard Epstein·interventional·Posted Sep 10, 2018·Updated Feb 21, 2023

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Episodic Future Thinking, Episodic Recent Thinking, and 2 other interventions for PreDiabetes. Completed, enrolled 78 participants across 2 sites.

Detailed Summary

The proposed research will translate research on delay discounting to the prevention of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in persons with prediabetes. In this study, the investigators will verify target engagement (DD) by examining if EFT improves DD under conditions shown to increase discounting of the future. Prediabetics will be randomized to receive EFT/ERT in a factorial design when experiencing simulated poverty/neutral conditions, respectively. The effects will be measured on DD. The investigators predict that poverty conditions will increase discounting of the future for ERT subjects, but those receiving EFT will show levels of DD similar to levels observed for participants in the wealth condition.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPreDiabetes
CountriesUnited States

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
201820192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedSep 10, 2018
Enrollment StartFeb 12, 2018
Primary CompletionJun 30, 2018
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 5 monthsPosted 7.8 years ago

Interventions

Episodic Future Thinkingbehavioral

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic future cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Episodic Recent Thinkingbehavioral

Participants will be instructed to use their episodic recent cues as they engage in different decision making tasks.

Scarcity Narrativebehavioral

Participants will read a narrative to induce a scarcity mindset, in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have lost their job and have no current secondary income.

Neutral Narrativebehavioral

Participants will read a narrative in which they are asked to imagine a scenario in which they have been transferred between departmental jobs, with little change in salary/commute.