At a glance
ClinicalIndex Comparison RecordStandardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Franseen Needle With a Fork-tip Needle for EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy
In Brief
A clinical study evaluating Fork-tip Needle and Franseen Needle for EUS Guided Biopsy. Completed, enrolled 134 participants across 1 site.
Detailed Summary
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been established as an effective technique for sampling tissue inside and around the gastrointestinal tract, including the pancreas, liver, lymph nodes, and adrenal glands. EUS-FNA is convenient, minimally invasive, and safe procedure with an estimated sensitivity of 75%-92% and a specificity of 82%-100%. Diagnosis of various pathologies in the GI tract including solid pancreatic masses, mediastinal or gastric lymph nodes, gastrointestinal submucosal lesions, and peri-rectal lesions require adequate tissue architecture and immunohistochemical analysis. This is difficult to obtain and is frequently insufficient with EUS-FNA cytology alone. The core tissue is required to improve the diagnostic yield and obtain histologic diagnosis along with immunostaining to establish specimen adequacy. In past 1 year two new needle EUS needle (Shark Core)and Acquire EUS needles has been introduced to improve diagnostic accuracy, tissue yield, and potentially obtain a core tissue sample. So far, no prospective studies have compared these two needles to see which one is better for overall diagnostic accuracy. Our goal is to perform a prospective analysis to compare the diagnostic yield and safety profile of these 2 new EUS needle.
Study Details
Timeline
Interventions
Fork-tip Needle will be used to obtain biopsy
Franseen Needle will be used to obtain biopsy