CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 326,658 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Intrauterine devicedevice
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03754556
NCT03754556N/ACompleted

Study on the Association of Uterine Perforation and Intrauterine Device (IUD) Expulsion With Breastfeeding Status at the Time of IUD Insertion and Postpartum Timing of IUD Insertion in Electronic Medical Record Databases - A Postmarketing Requirement for Mirena

Bayer·observational·Posted Nov 27, 2018·Updated Dec 4, 2020

In Brief

An observational study evaluating Intrauterine device for Intrauterine Devices. Completed, enrolled 326,658 participants across 4 sites.

Detailed Summary

Study to analyze electronic medical records of women using an intrauterine device (IUD). The study was required by the FDA for the marketed IUD Mirena (US Post-marketing requirement; short name of study: APEX IUD). The study analyzed the risks that the IUD was expelled or perforated the womb for the following group comparisons: * Women who were breastfeeding at the time of IUD insertion and within 52 weeks postpartum versus women who were not breastfeeding at the time of IUD insertion and within 52 weeks postpartum. * Women who had a first observed IUD insertion within different time periods after childbirth (i.e., ≤ 6 weeks, \> 6 weeks and ≤ 14 weeks, \> 14 weeks and ≤ 52 weeks) versus women who had their first observed IUD insertion more than 52 weeks after childbirth, including women without a recorded delivery within the past 52 weeks. An additional analysis involved 5-level postpartum timing (i.e., 0 to 3 days, 4 days to ≤ 6 weeks, \> 6 weeks to ≤ 14 weeks, \> 14 weeks to ≤ 52 weeks) versus the \> 52 week postpartum group. The study also analyzed the risks that the IUD was expelled or perforated the womb for different types of IUDs. In addition, the study aimed to assess the following interactions: * The extent to which the type of IUD (IUDs releasing the hormone LNG versus Copper IUDs) modified the risk that an IUD was expelled or perforated the womb in relation to breastfeeding and/ or in relation to the point in time when the IUD was inserted after childbirth. * The extent to which the breastfeeding status modified the risk that an IUD was expelled or perforated the womb in relation to the point in time when the IUD was inserted after childbirth.

Study Details

Study Typeobservational
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesUnited States
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedNov 27, 2018
Enrollment StartDec 3, 2018
Primary CompletionNov 29, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 12 monthsPosted 7.6 years ago

Interventions

Intrauterine devicedevice

Intrauterine devices, e.g. BAY86-5028 (Mirena, Skyla, Kyleena), Liletta and ParaGard