CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/AActive· 1,445 enrolled
Drug / intervention
Culprit-only revascularization +1 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03772743
NCT03772743N/AActive

Functional Versus Culprit-only Revascularization in Elderly Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca·interventional·Posted Dec 11, 2018·Updated Apr 2, 2026

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating Culprit-only revascularization and Complete functionally-guided revascularization for Myocardial Infarction. Active but no longer recruiting, targeting 1,445 participants across 37 sites in 3 countries.

Detailed Summary

Elderly patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease are the highest risk population with the worst prognosis. No trial has ever been designed to optimize their outcome. The actual real-life standard of care is, in the best of the cases, culprit only revascularization. However, real-life registries show that outcome of MI elderly patients treated with this strategy is far from being optimal with at least a 15% rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction at 1 year. To date, studies on this population have been focused on devices (bare metal stent vs biodegradable drug eluting stent) or on dual antiplatelet regimen (long vs short) and no study was focused on evaluating if complete revascularization is able to improve the prognosis in these patients. The contemporary complete revascularization is represented by a functionally-driven revascularization that recently showed to significantly reduce myocardial infarction rate and outperformed an angio-complete revascularization. Thus, our hypothesis is that a functionally-driven complete revascularization in elderly patients with MI and multivessel disease may improve prognosis compared to the actual standard of care in these patients, namely culprit only revascularization. Being a "strategy" trial, we identified the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) as primary outcome of interest (all cause death, any MI, any stroke, any revascularization). Several pre-specified substudies have been planned. A detailed list of the substudies is available in the website of the trial (http://www.thefiretrial.com)

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
CountriesItaly, Poland, Spain
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/AActive
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedDec 11, 2018
Enrollment StartJul 15, 2019
Primary CompletionOct 30, 2022
Study CompletionOct 3, 2026
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3.3 yearsPosted 7.6 years ago

Interventions

Culprit-only revascularizationother

Implantation of drug eluting stents with biodegradable polymer with struts ≤65 μ in the culprit lesion of the MI. Each patient should receive revascularization with Supraflex stent or its newer versions

Complete functionally-guided revascularizationother

Implantation of drug eluting stents with biodegradable polymer with struts ≤65 μ in the culprit lesion of the MI and in all non culprit lesions with positive functional assessment. Each patient should receive revascularization with Supraflex stent or its newer versions