CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 12 enrolled
Drug / intervention
No dressing +3 moreother
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03815240
NCT03815240N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

Comparing the Effects of Three Different Dressings on the Cutaneous Response to Pressure and Shear of Sacral Skin: an Exploratory Crossover Study

Charite University, Berlin, Germany·interventional·Posted Jan 24, 2019·Updated May 6, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating No dressing, Mepilex® Border Sacrum, and 2 other interventions for Pressure Ulcer Prevention. Completed, enrolled 12 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

Skin functional parameters such as erythema or stratum corneum hydration have been successfully used in PU prevention research. These parameters are able to discriminate effects of different loading intensities and to measure PU preventive device performance. The overall aim of this study is to measure the effects of Mepilex® Border Sacrum Dressing on the skin structure and function during mechanical loading compared to (1) no dressing, (2) ALLEVYN Life Sacrum Dressing and (3) Optifoam® Gentle Liquitrap Sacrum Dressing.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsPressure Ulcer Prevention
CountriesGermany
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 24, 2019
Enrollment StartFeb 8, 2019
Primary CompletionJul 23, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 6 monthsPosted 7.4 years ago

Interventions

No dressingother

no dressing at sacrum

Mepilex® Border Sacrumother

adhesive sacrum dressing

ALLEVYN Life Sacrumother

adhesive sacrum dressing

Optifoam® Gentle Sacrumother

adhesive sacrum dressing