CI

At a glance

ClinicalIndex Comparison Record
N/ACompleted· 70 enrolled
Drug / intervention
VivaSight double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation +1 moreprocedure
Likely dose
Not stated in record
Structured eligibility isn't available for this trial yet — see the full criteria in the Eligibility tab below.

Standardized by ClinicalIndex from the ClinicalTrials.gov record · verify against the source.

Search/NCT03817879
NCT03817879N/ACompleted
CompareCT.gov

A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the VivaSight Double-lumen Tube With a Conventional Double-lumen Tube in Adult Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery

Ambu A/S·interventional·Posted Jan 28, 2019·Updated Feb 13, 2020

In Brief

A clinical study evaluating VivaSight double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation and Conventional double-lument tube for single-lung ventilation for Single Lung Ventilation and 3 related conditions. Completed, enrolled 70 participants across 1 site.

Detailed Summary

The aim of this study is to make a health economic evaluation comparing novice physicians use of VivaSight double-lumen tube and a conventional double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilation during thoracic surgery at a teaching hospital. The hypothesis is, that both double-lumen tubes are equally cost-effective and the the incidence of fiberoptic bronchoscope use it the same for both tubes.

Study Details

Study Typeinterventional
Allocation--
Masking--
Primary Purpose--
ConditionsSingle Lung Ventilation, Thoracic Surgery, Anesthesia, Cost-effectiveness
CountriesDenmark
Collaborators--

Timeline

N/ACompletedFinished
20192020202120222023202420252026
First PostedJan 28, 2019
Enrollment StartNov 2, 2018
Primary CompletionJan 31, 2019
TodayJul 2, 2026
Enrollment to primary: 3 monthsPosted 7.4 years ago

Interventions

VivaSight double-lumen tube for single-lung ventilationprocedure

Procedure using a tube with a camera

Conventional double-lument tube for single-lung ventilationprocedure

Procedure using a tube without a camera